12 Angry Men Juror #8 (Henry Fonda)

What is the background of Juror 8 in 12 Angry Men?

Juror 8 is a architect who is kind and compassionate. He was called in for jury duty to discuss the case of a teenager boy who was allegedly believed to have stabbed his father to death.

What is Juror 8 background?

Juror 8’s name is Davis and his occupation is an architect. It is obvious that he was very intelligent and has many years of experience in his job. You can tell that he is a good architect when he specificly demonstrates things like how far the old man went from his room to the door and he even drew out blue prints.

Who is Juror 8 antagonist?

Foreman – In charge of the proceedings in the jury room, he holds out that the boy is guilty until act 3 when he hears enough evidence to change his mind. Juror Three – Antagonist of juror eight, he holds out that the boy is guilty the longest.

Why did Juror 8 change his vote?

In the first vote, Juror 8 is the only one to vote not guilty. … He does this not because he really feels that the defendant is necessarily innocent, but for another reason altogether. He votes not guilty because he feels that the group should discuss a case with such serious consequences before deciding.

How do jurors #3 #7 and #10 feel about the explanation given by Juror 8?

how does jurors #3 , 7, and 10 feel about the explanation given by #8? they weren’t happy and disagreed , they thought it was a waste of time and it was to hot for them to care. … he changes the jurors mind on what they think about the boy being from the slums because he is from the slums so he gets offended.

Is Juror 8 a true story?

Juror 8 is loosely based on the first trial by jury in South Korean history. … Which leads the judge and jury — the real-life case actually had nine jurors — to reexamine the evidence before they all make a decision they’ll surely regret.

Who is the villain of 12 Angry Men?

Juror 3 is the third of twelve jury members and the main antagonist in the teleplay and movie 12 Angry Men. He was portrayed by the late Lee J. Cobb in the 1957 film, and by the late George C. Scott in the 1997 TV film.

Why did Juror 8 probably assume Juror 5 had seen knife fights in movies?

Why did juror 8 probably assume juror 5 had seen knife fights in movies? Because juror 8 has probably only seen knife fights in movies. … Juror Eight explains that the people don’t have to prove the defendant didn’t commit the crime, but instead they have to prove the defendant did do the crime.

Where did Juror 8 buy the knife?

One of the biggest pieces of evidence against the defendant is the uniqueness of the knife he apparently used to kill his father. But Juror #8 blows this theory out of the water by reaching into his pocket and pulling out the exact same knife, which he bought for six bucks at a nearby store.

Article first time published on

How does Juror 8 stand up for fairness and justice?

The 8th juror insists that the jury members investigate the evidence before returning a verdict. He insists on the need to scrutinise the circumstantial evidence and establish the degree of doubt surrounding the testimonies. He represents justice; he believes that everyone should have a fair and just trial.

Did Juror 8 live in the slums?

You know, living in a slum, his mother dead since he was nine. That’s not a very good head start. He’s a tough, angry kid.

Why does Juror 7 change his vote?

Juror 7 is also shown to be ethnocentric and xenophobic when he insults the immigrant Juror 11. When Juror 7 switches his vote to “Not guilty” because he had enough, the immigrant Juror 11 gets mad and humiliates Juror 7, telling him that he has no right to play like this with the man’s life.

Who did Juror #8 call a sadist and why?

ABAct IIThe vote is 9-3 in favor of guilty.Act IIThe simulation of the old man in his apartment takes placeAct IIJuror 8 calls Juror 3 a sadist.Act II.Juror 3 lunges a Juror 8.

What does Juror #8 say that makes Juror #3 so angry?

object or material that will prove or disprove a fact or belief. objective existence. What does Juror #8 say that makes Juror #3 so angry? Accuses him of voting guilty just because he wants to see the defendant die, not because he truly believes he is guilty.

How are the actions of juror 3 and Juror 8 similar?

These two jurors are almost the plain opposite of each other. Juror 3 appears to be a very intolerant man accustomed of forcing his wishes and views upon others. On the other hand, Juror 8 is an honest man who keeps an open mind for both evidence and reasonable doubt.

What does Juror #8 say about truth and prejudice does the jury have reasonable doubt?

That’s in the Constitution. Juror #8: It’s always difficult to keep personal prejudice out of a thing like this. And wherever you run into it, prejudice always obscures the truth. … No jury can declare a man guilty unless it’s SURE.

How does Juror Eight disprove the old man's testimony of hearing the boy and seeing him run down the stairs?

The Jury will make another vote and if everyone still votes guilty, they were bring a guilty vote in to the judge. … How does Juror 8 disprove the old mans testimony of hearing and seeing the boy run down the stairs? Since the man was older, it would’ve been impossible for him to reach the door in just 15 seconds.

What fault with whose testimony does Juror #8 first find?

Juror 8 revealed that he had the same “one of a kind knife” that the defendant bought the night of the murder (which also ended up being the murder weapon or like the murder weapon).

What does Juror #11 do for a living?

Biography. Number Eleven was Orignally from Germany, He Escaped. He was also a “watch maker”,Now he’s a Juror who feels self-conscious about his foreign accent. He is very serious about democracy and America’s legal system.

Who was the most important juror in Twelve Angry Men?

Juror #8. He votes “not guilty” during the jury’s first vote. Described as “thoughtful” and “gentle,” Juror #8 is usually portrayed as the most heroic member of the jury.

What is Juror 3's name?

12 Angry Men Juror #3 (Lee J. Cobb)

What was Juror #3 doing that made Juror #8 angry causing him to exclaim This isn't a game?

What was Juror#3 doing that made Juror#8 angry, causing him to exclaim, “this isn’t a game!”? He was playing tic-tac-toe.

How does the 8th juror cast doubt on the knife evidence?

How did Juror #8 cast doubt on the link between the murder weapon and the defendant? Answer: He produced an identical knife that he had purchased from a pawnshop. When the foreman carried out a preliminary poll around the room, Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) was the only person to cast a “not guilty” vote.

When Juror #8 recreates the scene How long does it take for the old man to get from his bed to the door?

Juror #8 recreates the same dimensions of the old man’s bedroom and apartment hallway. The others think he’s wasting their time, but he can only cover the distance in 41 seconds while the old man was supposed to have done it in 15.

What is the 8th Jurors job in 12 Angry Men?

architecture, justice, and fairness. More so than his fellow jurors, Juror 8 is interested in making sure the case is resolved on the basis of reason and not strong emotions. Challenge… convincing his fellow jurors that the defendant is not guilty, or at least that there’s reasonable doubt.

Why is Five convinced that the boy?

Why is Five convinced that the boy did not stab his father? … He’s convinced because the boy is an experienced knife fighter and from the wound they had stabbed downward which makes him convinced the boy didn’t do it. Five is an authority because he has seen knife fights in his backyard where he grew up.

What does Henry Fonda do to change the minds of the other jurors?

Fonda asked his followers to base their decision on logic and facts rather than biased feelings. He encouraged discussion among the jury and for every piece of evidence to be analyzed carefully. He actively encouraged the jury to view the case from another point of view as it was a life or death matter.

Why does Juror 3 want the boy to be guilty?

Juror 3 has a son that he hasn’t spoken to in 3 years, so he is anxious to blame ‘rotten kids’ for all the problems that exist in the world. He was ashamed when his son was 8 and walked away from a fight, so he rode him hard to ‘make a man out of him.

Why does Eleven question seven so closely?

Why does 11 question 7 so closely about his motives? Why is 11 so interested? Because he knows that 7’s in a hurry, so doubts that he has any real reasonable arguments for switching sides.

How does Juror #5 react to their prejudices?

When the other jurors express prejudices, how does juror #5 react? He agrees with them because it is his viewpoint as well. He doesn’t say anything but quietly goes to the window. He asks them to explain their viewpoints in more detail, so that he can agree with them.